Skip to main content
· 8/28/1989

Manfred Lewis Estes v. United States

Citations

  • 883 F.2d 645
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12937
  • 1989 WL 98760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, if “counsel failed to explain adequately the nature of the plea agreement,” the trial court’s verification of a defendant’s understanding of the matter during the plea colloquy showed that no prejudice accrued therefrom
  • remanding for hearing on whether Estes requested counsel to file direct appeal
  • “the prior judgment of conviction and sentence should be vacated and a new judgment entered which would enable [petitioner] to appeal therefrom after such entry.”
  • counsel's failure to file notice of appeal when so instructed by client
  • conclusory allegation was insufficient to rebut strong presumption of counsel's competence
  • conclusory allegation was insufficient to rebut strong presumption of counsel's competence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Bowman, Bright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.