Kildare v. Saenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a procedural due process claim requires a deprivation of a protected liberty or property interest and a denial of procedural protections
• “We hold that Appellants do not meet the third 10 requirement [for mandamus relief under § 1361] because administrative review could correct the 11 individual errors alleged by Appellants. Thus, there is an adequate alternative remedy.”
• “We hold that Appellants do not meet 2 the third requirement [for mandamus relief under § 1361] because administrative review could 3 correct the individual errors alleged by Appellants. Thus, there is an adequate alternative 4 remedy.”
• final decision requires “complete 3 exhaustion of administrative remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College District
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-10-08· cited 117×
• L.N.P. v. Kilolo Kijakazi
  Fourth Circuit· 2023-04-07· cited 43×
• California Shock Trauma Air Rescue v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-03-31· cited 41×
• Hall v. Sebelius
  District of Columbia· 2009-09-29· cited 32×
• Friends of Roeding Park v. City of Fresno
  E.D. California· 2012-01-31· cited 16×
• Beattie v. Barnhart
  District of Columbia· 2012-02-28· cited 15×
• Huling v. City of Los Banos
  E.D. California· 2012-04-19· cited 13×
• Saini v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
  E.D. California· 2008-03-27· cited 5×
• Paul Grondal v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2022-06-13· cited 4×
• Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board
  C.D. California· 2015-03-12· cited 2×
• Rodriquez v. Astrue
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-11-26· cited 1×
• Garnett v. Zeilinger
  District of Columbia· 2018-05-31
• District of Columbia v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  District of Columbia· 2020-03-13
• Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Mnuchin
  District of Columbia· 2020-06-15
• Williams v. Walsh
  District of Columbia· 2022-07-18
• California v. U.S. E.P.A.
  N.D. California· 2018-12-21
• Arunga v. Barnhart
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-17
• Myung Hee Sung v. Ashcroft
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-09-17
• Kim v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-12-16
• Magiera v. Norton
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-09-02

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Zinermon v. Burch
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
• Bowen v. City of New York
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 2,998×
• Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-08-30· cited 2,302×
• Maine v. Thiboutot
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,890×
• Heckler v. Ringer
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 1,473×
• Suter v. Artist M.
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 620×
• Miguel GONZALEZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant/Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-09-12· cited 448×
• Crayton v. Callahan
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 232×
• Shelley Sommatino v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-06-18· cited 204×
• Patel v. Reno
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-01· cited 160×
• Kildare v. Saenz
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-24· cited 114×
• Morales v. City of Los Angeles
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-06-12· cited 112×
• 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 80, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15,133 Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-02-22· cited 101×
• Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-08-06· cited 97×
• Paul K. Raditch, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-03-26· cited 88×
• 27 soc.sec.rep.ser. 313, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 14915a Charles Briggs v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D.
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-25· cited 85×
• Hufford v. McEnaney
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-22· cited 76×
• Reynaldo Tongol, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. William J. Usery, Jr., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-08-06· cited 64×
• Schoolcraft v. Sullivan
  Eighth Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 46×
• R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Babbitt
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-14· cited 44×