Crayton v. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to exhaust remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is jurisdictional
• holding that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies under section 405(g) is jurisdictional
• explaining that dismissal of a complaint against the Commissioner was proper so that the plaintiffs could “pursue administrative remedies and then return to federal court if appropriate”
• reasoning that the SSA “may always waive the exhaustion requirement” and “[i]t may be held to have done so by failing to challenge the sufficiency of the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint”
• dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims “without prejudice, so that they may pursue administrative remedies and then return to federal court if appropriate”
• dismissing the petitioner’s claims “without prejudice, so that they may pursue administrative remedies and then return to federal court if appropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).