Kildare v. Saenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a procedural due process claim requires a deprivation of a protected liberty or property interest and a denial of procedural protections
• “We hold that Appellants do not meet the third 10 requirement [for mandamus relief under § 1361] because administrative review could correct the 11 individual errors alleged by Appellants. Thus, there is an adequate alternative remedy.”
• “We hold that Appellants do not meet 2 the third requirement [for mandamus relief under § 1361] because administrative review could 3 correct the individual errors alleged by Appellants. Thus, there is an adequate alternative 4 remedy.”
• final decision requires “complete 3 exhaustion of administrative remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).