Skip to main content
· 3/26/1991

Paul K. Raditch, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

Citations

  • 929 F.2d 478
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 3447
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2132
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4745
  • 1991 WL 39718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the holdings of Parratt and Hudson to the termination of FECA benefits
  • applying the holdings of Parratt and Hudson to the termination of FECA benefits
  • “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth 28 Amendment.”
  • “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth 28 Amendment.”
  • “A violation of procedural rights requires only a procedural correction, not the reinstatement of a substantive right to which the claimant may not be entitled on the merits”
  • “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment.” (citation and footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Leavy, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.