· 3/26/1991
Paul K. Raditch, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
Citations
- 929 F.2d 478
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 3447
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2132
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4745
- 1991 WL 39718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the holdings of Parratt and Hudson to the termination of FECA benefits
- applying the holdings of Parratt and Hudson to the termination of FECA benefits
- “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth 28 Amendment.”
- “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth 28 Amendment.”
- “A violation of procedural rights requires only a procedural correction, not the reinstatement of a substantive right to which the claimant may not be entitled on the merits”
- “Although Hudson involved § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, the same due process principles apply to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment.” (citation and footnote omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Leavy, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.