Skip to main content

K.F. v. State

Citations

  • 961 N.E.2d 501
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 19
  • 2012 WL 169272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient evidence to sustain a juvenile adjudication for theft where K.F. admitted to being on the property on the day in question and some of the stolen property was later found at the home of K.F.’s friend
  • “[T]he theft statute does not require the State to prove that a defendant was found in possession of the stolen property or that the property was later recovered in order to find that a person committed theft.”
  • “[T]he theft statute does not require the State to prove that a defendant was found in possession of the stolen property or that the property was later recovered in order to find that a person committed theft.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Friedlander, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.