Skip to main content
· 12/3/1992

Ellyson v. State

Citations

  • 603 N.E.2d 1369
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1798
  • 1992 WL 353104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing six methods, one of which was later eliminated by the adoption of Evidence Rule 610
  • affirming husband’s burglary conviction for breaking into house he previously shared with estranged wife even though he may have held a right to possession co-equal with wife at time of breaking but evidence showed entry was unauthorized
  • affirming husband’s burglary conviction for breaking into house he previously shared with estranged wife even though he may have held a right to possession co-equal with wife at time of breaking but evidence showed entry was unauthorized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conover, Chezem, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.