· 12/3/1992
Ellyson v. State
Citations
- 603 N.E.2d 1369
- 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1798
- 1992 WL 353104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing six methods, one of which was later eliminated by the adoption of Evidence Rule 610
- affirming husband’s burglary conviction for breaking into house he previously shared with estranged wife even though he may have held a right to possession co-equal with wife at time of breaking but evidence showed entry was unauthorized
- affirming husband’s burglary conviction for breaking into house he previously shared with estranged wife even though he may have held a right to possession co-equal with wife at time of breaking but evidence showed entry was unauthorized
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conover, Chezem, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.