Skip to main content

Mathis v. State

Citations

  • 859 N.E.2d 1275
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 32
  • 2007 WL 114163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence was sufficient to support “bodily injury” element of battery where victim testified that defendant’s actions caused her to “hurt” and “kinda see[] stars for a second.”
  • explaining that “the admission of hearsay is not grounds for reversal where it is merely cumulative of other evidence admitted”
  • noting the admission of hearsay “is not grounds for reversal where it is merely cumulative of other evidence admitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Sharpnack, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.