Kest v. Hana Ranch, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “when confronted with amendments that add plaintiffs with new claims, courts can protect defendants from the perils statute of limitations are enacted to prevent while effectuating the policies of [HRCP R]ule 15(c) by applying a two-step analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-07-31· cited 105×
• Heiser v. Association of Apartment Owners of Polo Beach Club
  D. Hawaii· 1993-07-20· cited 14×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ellis v. Crockett
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1969-02-25· cited 143×
• Raynor Brothers, a General Partnership v. American Cyanimid Company, Agricultural Division, a Foreign Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-12-28· cited 57×
• Heather Kitchel Leachman, Northern Counties Lumber, Inc. v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, a Delaware Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-12-03· cited 55×
• Meredith v. United Air Lines
  S.D. California· 1966-08-26· cited 36×
• Allied International Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
  First Circuit· 1987-03-23· cited 34×
• Mauian Hotel, Inc. v. Maui Pineapple Company
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1971-02-22· cited 27×
• The Nature Conservancy v. Nakila
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-10-31· cited 25×
• Cunningham v. Quaker Oats Co.
  W.D. New York· 1985-08-05· cited 18×
• Gridley v. Sayre & Fisher Co.
  D. South Dakota· 1976-03-24· cited 8×