Cunningham v. Quaker Oats Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a defendant is fully apprised of the conduct which has given rise to the action, his ability to defend will not be impaired.”
• new plaintiff allowed to be named in complaint, where defense to original plaintiff's claim was primarily legal in nature, the defense had already been tried and it applied to both the original and new plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tynes v. Bankers Life Co.
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-17· cited 53×
• Noonan v. Rauh
  First Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 41×
• Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.
  D. Delaware· 1993-02-04· cited 34×
• Hull v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-08-10· cited 30×
• Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
  E.D. New York· 1999-06-03· cited 21×
• Riffe Ex Rel. Riffe v. Magushi
  S.D. West Virginia· 1994-07-08· cited 16×
• In Re Glacier Bay
  D. Alaska· 1990-09-28· cited 16×
• Evans v. Salem Hospital
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 11×
• LeMasters v. K-Mart, Inc.
  E.D. Louisiana· 1989-04-27· cited 8×
• New York v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.
  W.D. New York· 2002-07-22· cited 5×
• Kest v. Hana Ranch, Inc.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1990-01-31· cited 3×
• Weisfelner v. Blavatnik (In re Lyondell Chemical Co.)
  S.D. New York· 2016-01-04· cited 2×
• Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Third Dimension (3d) Semiconductor, Inc.
  D. Maine· 2009-01-14· cited 1×