Mauian Hotel, Inc. v. Maui Pineapple Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amended complaint related back to a timely asserted original complaint alleging the same factual situation
• holding that “the statute of limitations is a personal defense and a person may waive the benefits of such statute”
• concluding that a third-party defendant who entered into a court-approved stipulation with an insurance carrier, which permitted the insurance carrier to amend its answer to include a claim against the third-party defendant, was estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense
• applying Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 15(c) concerning amendment of a pleading
• an action to recover for property damage caused by the overflow from a burst dam, id. at 564, 481 P. 2d at 312
• amended claims will not be barred if other party has been put on notice in- the original pleading regarding what evidence to gather, regardless of when the claim itself is asserted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).