Kermanshah v. Kermanshah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts typically disregard subsequent pleadings only where they are “blatant” or “directly contradictory” as opposed to merely “inconsistent” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• declining to disregard allegations in an amended complaint because plaintiff “ha[d] not made changes that directly contradict the facts set forth in the original complaint” (emphasis added)
• denying a motion to dismiss after a plaintiff amended his complaint to allege fraudulent acts by defendant, after the initial complaint was outside of the statute of limitation
• \New York's statute of limitations for breach of an express or implied contract is six years\
• \New York's statute of limitations for unjust enrichment is six years....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).