Liveintent, Inc. v. Naples

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming that \estoppel principles can apply to findings made in administrative proceedings and affect subsequent judicial proceedings\
• articulating that collateral estoppel is an equitable doctrine requiring satisfaction of five factors, including that the determination of the issue for which collateral estoppel is sought be \essential to the prior judgment\
• recognizing right to bring CEPA retaliation action based on mixed-motive theory
• stating that Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharm. Corp., 118 N.J. 89, 97, 570 A.2d 903 (1990) adopted the framework for Title VII disparate treatment claims stated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973) to CEPA claims
• describing the \civil service disciplinary system\ as an \administrative system designed to promote a fair and uniform statewide system of public employee discipline\
• Winters \could not fold his arms . . . on a [retaliation] claim that he has raised\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).