D.C. Circuit· 8/5/2011
Jones v. Astrue
Citations
- 647 F.3d 350
- 396 U.S. App. D.C. 235
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16144
- 2011 WL 3375581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence was new because it was not “available, or even in existence, at the time of the ALJ hearing”
- remanding to the SSA so that the ALJ may properly apply the treating physician rule
- noting step four “requires the claimant to show that he does not have the ‘residual functional capacity’ to perform the requirements of his past relevant work”
- “[T]he ALJ did not, as required by the treating physician rule, explain his reasons for rejecting [the treating physician’s] opinion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Brown, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gamret v. ColvinW.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-01-10· cited 67×
- Espinosa v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-02· cited 36×
- Maria Saunders v. Kilolo KijakaziD.C. Circuit· 2021-07-23· cited 34×
- Contreras v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-09· cited 26×
- Broyles v. BarnhartDistrict of Columbia· 2012-12-18· cited 18×
- Callaway v. BerryhillD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-16· cited 16×
- Angela Cox v. Kilolo KijakaziD.C. Circuit· 2023-07-28· cited 14×
- Warfield v. ColvinDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-22· cited 11×
- Gumpad v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-25· cited 5×
- Campfield v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2016-12-28· cited 4×
- Kenner v. BerryhillD.C. Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 4×
- Page v. BerryhillD.C. Circuit· 2017-05-09· cited 4×
- Moore v. BerryhillD.C. Circuit· 2018-07-03· cited 3×
- Gilliland v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-15· cited 2×
- Jackson v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2017-08-02· cited 2×
- Clark v. ColvinDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-11· cited 2×
- Youmans v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-24· cited 1×
- Scott v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-19· cited 1×
- Williams v. BerryhillDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-31· cited 1×
- Max v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2014-03-31
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 3,376×
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 706×
- Donald B. Jackson v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityEleventh Circuit· 1996-11-20· cited 417×
- Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.D.C. Circuit· 2004-01-13· cited 238×
- L.G. CAULDER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1986-06-17· cited 172×
- Bauzo v. BowenSeventh Circuit· 1986-10-17· cited 108×
- Roscoe Simms v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1989-06-27· cited 105×
- Gerber, John E. v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2002-07-02· cited 88×
- Margaret Williams v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1993-07-09· cited 83×
- Elmer G. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1985-08-05· cited 61×
- Ambrocio P. Igonia v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., as Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareD.C. Circuit· 1977-11-17· cited 47×
- Dr Pepper/seven-Up Companies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1993-04-16· cited 34×
- Louis Goerg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantNinth Circuit· 1981-04-09· cited 23×
- Jones v. AstrueD.C. Circuit· 2011-07-08· cited 8×
- Jones v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.