Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 8/5/2011

Jones v. Astrue

Citations

  • 647 F.3d 350
  • 396 U.S. App. D.C. 235
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16144
  • 2011 WL 3375581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that evidence was new because it was not “available, or even in existence, at the time of the ALJ hearing”
  • remanding to the SSA so that the ALJ may properly apply the treating physician rule
  • noting step four “requires the claimant to show that he does not have the ‘residual functional capacity’ to perform the requirements of his past relevant work”
  • “[T]he ALJ did not, as required by the treating physician rule, explain his reasons for rejecting [the treating physician’s] opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Brown, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.