Kennedy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant waived his complaint that the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony because, though appellant had a “running objection” to the experts’ testimony regarding proper application of retrograde extrapolation, he never pursued this objection to an adverse ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Larry Wayne Parker v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-07-15
• Jorge Alvarado v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-06-04
• Charles Alton Gary v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2013-09-18
• James Richard Hoover v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2017-01-05

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mosley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-01· cited 2,969×
• Wyatt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-03· cited 1,327×
• Mendez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-30· cited 1,231×
• Kelly v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-05· cited 1,156×
• Bigon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-01-16· cited 588×
• Russeau v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 582×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-02-12· cited 432×
• Mata v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-06· cited 258×
• Hinojosa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-27· cited 254×
• Griffith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 158×
• Bhakta v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-11-06· cited 12×