Skip to main content
· 11/25/2002

Shadron v. State

Citations

  • 573 S.E.2d 73
  • 275 Ga. 767

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s “construction ofthe jury instruction [which] would require reading it in disjointed portions, without context”; reaffirming that the jury charge must be viewed “as a whole”
  • rejecting defendant’s “construction of the jury instruction [which] would require reading it in disjointed portions, without context”; reaffirming that the jury charge must be viewed “as a whole”
  • trial court’s unnecessary and superfluous jury instructions regarding the grand jury process were not a basis for reversal when defendant failed to show prejudice
  • “In order to have reversible error, there must be harm as well as error and the lack of harm makes this enumeration of error without merit.”
  • no reversible error where instruction about grand jury process did not mislead the jury about “the State’s burden of proof at any stage of the proceeding and . . . did not diminish the presumption of innocence” when viewed in context of entire jury charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.