White v. Kelso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction where appellate counsel did not raise claim of ineffectiveness in a motion for new trial or on direct appeal
• discussing application of rule, that new counsel must raise claim of previous counsel’s ineffectiveness at first possible stage of post-conviction review, in connection with habeas petitions and direct appeals
• discussing application of rule, that new counsel must raise claim of previous counsel’s ineffectiveness at first possible stage of post-conviction review, in connection with habeas petitions and direct appeals
• “the claim may be raised for the first time in the direct appeal if the direct appeal marks the first appearance of new counsel”
• “an attorney cannot reasonably be expected to assert or argue his or her own ineffectiveness”
• “an attorney cannot reasonably be expected to assert or argue his or her own ineffectiveness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).