Skip to main content

Kendren Leedy v. Brad Leedy

Citations

  • 399 S.W.3d 335
  • 2013 WL 1197775
  • 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 3190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • husband established wife’s acceptance of benefits where wife accepted husband’s $125,000 payment in exchange for her 50 percent interest in a company
  • husband established wife’s acceptance of benefits where wife accepted husband’s $125,000 payment in exchange for her 50 percent interest in a company
  • appellant’s failure to establish that acceptance of benefits doctrine did not apply or that an exception applied prevented challenge to judgment on appeal
  • appellee who contended cash benefits exception applied because only benefit accepted was cash but offered no support for contention did not meet burden to demonstrate exception applied
  • appellant who failed to explain how cash benefits exception applied to case waived argument
  • “The application of estoppel in a particular case does not necessarily mean the judgment in question is thereby rendered valid; it simply means that the estopped party will not be heard to assert the judgment’s invalidity in order to avoid its provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyce, Christopher, Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kendren Leedy v. Brad Leedy

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.