Samples Exterminators v. Samples

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the complaining party could not revoke consent when, “after the parties voiced their approval of the settlement dictated in open court, the trial court rendered judgment by ordering them to sign and follow the agreement”
• holding that the trial court rendered judgment when it said, “[T]he Court approves the settlement made in open court and orders all parties to sign any and all papers necessary to carry out this agreement and to carry out the agreement that was made and dictated into the record”
• holding that the trial court rendered judgment when it said, “[T]he Court approves the settlement made in open court and orders all parties to sign any and all papers necessary to carry out this agreement and to carry out the agreement that was made and dictated into the record”
• stating that a judgment \is in fact rendered whenever the trial judge officially announces his decision in open court . . . in his official capacity for his official guidance whether orally or by written memorandum the sentence of law pronounced by him in any cause\
• upholding injunction that was granted by court based on parties’ consent in open court
• upholding injunction that was granted by court based on parties' consent in open court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).