Browning v. Placke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a judgment is void when the court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter or to enter the particular judgment
• recognizing that only void judgments are subject to collateral attack in Texas
• indicating that judgment is void when, among other things, it is apparent that court rendering judgment “had . . . no jurisdiction of the subject matter”
• indicating that judgment is void when, among other things, it is apparent that court rendering judgment \had . . . no jurisdiction of the subject matter\
• indicating that judgment is void when, among other things, it is apparent that court rendering judgment \had . . . no jurisdiction of the subject matter\
• noting that errors other than jurisdictional deficiencies must be corrected on direct attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).