Skip to main content
· 12/4/1997

Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. Liedeker

Citations

  • 958 S.W.2d 382
  • 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 142
  • 1997 Tex. LEXIS 125
  • 1997 WL 751575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court’s statement on record that it would note its refusal on requests preserved error despite trial court’s failure to endorse and sign requests
  • concluding that trial court’s statement on record that it would note its refusal on requests preserved error despite trial court’s failure to endorse and sign requests
  • obtaining trial court's endorsement not only means of preserving error regarding refused proposed instruction
  • muffling elevator gate alarm resulted in premises claim, not general claim for negligent activity
  • obtaining trial court’s endorsement not only means of preserving error regarding refused proposed instruction
  • to establish the liability of a premises owner, invitee must prove that “(1) a condition of the premises created an unreasonable risk of harm to the invitee; (2) the owner knew or reasonably should have known of the condition; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hankinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.