Kendall v. Ges Exposition Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “However, discrete or separate questions should be counted as separate interrogatories, notwithstanding they are joined by a conjunctive word and may be related.”
• “If the questions are relevant to the case, it could be argued that all the interrogatories are ‘related.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leaffer v. Zarlengo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-04-15· cited 53×
• Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
  District of Columbia· 2004-05-03· cited 39×
• Mezu v. Morgan State University
  D. Maryland· 2010-10-22· cited 28×
• Trevino v. ACB American, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2006-01-27· cited 27×
• Mullins v. Prudential Insurance
  W.D. Kentucky· 2010-04-30· cited 21×
• Estate of Manship v. United States
  M.D. Louisiana· 2005-12-08· cited 18×
• Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  E.D. Texas· 2016-05-13· cited 14×
• Kline v. Springer
  District of Columbia· 2012-08-17· cited 6×
• Theobles v. Industrial Maintenance Co.
  Virgin Islands· 2006-11-27· cited 3×
• Nyfield v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corp.
  Virgin Islands· 2001-05-10· cited 3×
• Hernandez, Kroone & Associates, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-06-16
• Jdh Capital LLC v. Flowers
  North Carolina Business Court· 2007-10-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ginn v. Gemini Inc.
  D. Nevada· 1991-06-05· cited 18×
• Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co.
  D. Kansas· 1996-12-19· cited 16×
• Valdez v. Ford Motor Co.
  D. Nevada· 1991-02-12· cited 8×