Skip to main content
W.D. Kentucky· 4/30/2010

Mullins v. Prudential Insurance

Citations

  • 267 F.R.D. 504
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52468
  • 2010 WL 1802044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s “passing reference” to the existence of the administrative record was insufficient to answer interrogatory requesting facts to support the defendant’s affirmative defense
  • finding that discovery of attorney’s fees that defendant sought to discover was “somewhat premature” and denying request for production of such information
  • stating that production of materials regarding claims personnel training “would not appear to the Court to necessarily bear directly on any potential bias of those employees who were directly involved in the administration of Mullins’[s] own claim”
  • noting the “essential question” is “what must a plaintiff in an ERISA [action] show in order to embark upon such a foray”
  • noting the conclusion of district courts in Kentucky and Tennessee that Glenn “liberalized discovery to a degree” in ERISA cases
  • requiring the defendant to produce any documents to which it “in its interrogatory responses referred ... outside the administrative record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whalin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.