Mezu v. Morgan State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing IIED claim because conduct upon which it was based 17 fell under the category of normal employment relations
• acts based on “normal 1 employment relations” fall short of extreme and outrageous conduct
• “A simple pleading of personnel management activity is insufficient to 18 support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress, even if improper motivation is 19 alleged.” (quoting Janken v. GM Hughes Elec., 53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 741 (1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).