Skip to main content
· 2/12/1991

Valdez v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 134 F.R.D. 296
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2539
  • 1991 WL 24978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing corporate veil claim where defendant “fails to allege any sort of fraud or injustice necessary to state a claim for piercing the corporate veil”
  • party “fail[ed] to allege any sort of fraud or injustice necessary to state a claim for piercing the corporate veil” and did not “adequately indicate on what basis [they] intended] to have the corporate veil pierced”
  • applying Rule 8(a)(2) to non-fraud claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.