Hawaii Supreme Court· 9/26/2006

Kekona v. Abastillas

Citations

150 P.3d 823
113 Haw. 174
2006 Haw. LEXIS 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the clear and convincing standard applies to UFTA fraudulent transfer claims
holding that the proper standard of proof for a civil fraudulent transfer proceeding was the clear and convincing standard of proof inasmuch as a finding of liability for a fraudulent transfer produces reputational harm that should not be inflicted absent that degree of proof
holding that the proper standard of proof for a civil fraudulent transfer proceeding was the clear and convincing standard of proof inasmuch as a finding of liability for a fraudulent transfer produces reputational harm that should not be inflicted absent that degree of proof
noting that preferential transfers may be fraudulent and subject to HUFTA
“[T]he element of fraud connotes dishonesty and effectively brands the liable defendant with an imprimatur of quasi-criminality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, Duffy, Lee, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Place

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kekona v. Abastillas

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.