Matthew Madonna v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court need not accept the moving party’s legal conclusions and characterizations
• granting motion for judgment in favor of defendant as to plaintiff’s fraud upon the court allegations because the plaintiff did not plead fraud with sufficient particularity
• granting motion for judgment in favor of defendant as to plaintiff’s fraud upon the court allegations because the plaintiff did not plead fraud with sufficient particularity
• affirming Rule 12(c) dismissal where the facts alleged, along with reasonable inferences in the non-moving party’s favor, were insufficient to “show any fraud or misrepresentation by the government”
• “One of the purposes of Rule 9(b) is to discourage the fifing of complaints as a pretext for discovery of unknown wrongs.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• Rule 60(b)(2) “allows the court to relieve a party from a judgment if new evidence of fraud or mistake is discovered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).