Amanda Culbertson v. Pat Lykos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assistant district attorney enjoyed qualified immunity from Section 1983 claims at the pleadings stage
• holding that the plaintiffs failed to allege a “widespread practice” of retaliation because they “offered no evidence that similar retaliation had victimized others.”
• holding that the plaintiffs failed to allege a “widespread practice” of retaliation because they “offered no evidence that similar retaliation had victimized others.”
• observing that a district attorney \arguably\ was a final policymaker in the specific area of determining what witnesses to use in prosecutions, though not deciding the issue
• finding that plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to allow their challenge to the loss of their jobs to proceed on a ratification theory
• holding allegations “limited to the events surrounding the plaintiffs” are insufficient to es- tablish a widespread practice or custom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).