Roberts v. City of Shreveport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of an officer brandishing his handgun during a traffic stop, committing one other incident of deadly force, and receiving two complaints of excessive force insufficient to establish a pattern of unconstitutional conduct
• concluding that past instances of police officer's displaying weapon during traffic stop did not place police chief on notice regarding risk that the officer would use excessive force in part because \traffic stops ... are inherently dangerous\
• concluding that certain newspaper articles, which were “classic, inadmissible hearsay,” even if they were “proven up properly,” were insufficient to oppose a motion for summary judgment in a § 1983 suit
• concluding that certain newspaper articles, which were “classic, inadmissible hearsay,” even if they were “proven up properly,” were insufficient to oppose a motion for summary judgment in a § 1983 suit
• holding that evidence of an officer brandishing his handgun during a traffic stop, committing one other incident of deadly force, and receiving two complaints of excessive force insufficient to establish a pattern of unconstitutional conduct
• holding that evidence of an officer brandishing his handgun during a traffic stop, committing one other incident of deadly force, and receiving two complaints of excessive force insufficient to establish a pattern of unconstitutional conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).