Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 8/1/1996

Keenan v. Allan

Citations

  • 91 F.3d 1275
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 9329
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5677
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18802
  • 1996 WL 428509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the non-moving party must\ identify with reasonable particularity the evidence that precludes summary judgment\
  • noting that district court need not “scour the record in 28 search of a genuine issue of triable fact” (citation omitted)
  • holding the court need not “scour 2 the record in search of a genuine issue of triable fact.”
  • noting that it is not the 14 court’s task “to scour the record in search of a genuine issue of triable fact.”
  • noting that it is not the court's 10 task “to scour the record in search of a genuine issue of triable fact.”
  • noting that it is not the court’s 5 task “to scour the record in search of a genuine issue of triable fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Nelson, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

234 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Keenan v. Allan

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.