N.D. California· 8/4/2016
Cleveland v. Groceryworks.com, LLC
Citations
- 200 F. Supp. 3d 924
- 101 Fed. R. Serv. 61
- 2016 WL 4140504
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103672
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, while not 25 always the case, “liability under the UCL is generally derivative of liability under another 26 statutory violation”
- finding “personal 10 knowledge and competence to testify are often inferable from the facts stated in the affidavit”
- describing the California standard and the FLSA standard for determining when work 14 by an employee is compensable as “equivalent”
- declining to strike entire affidavit based on small deviations 5 from deposition testimony
- “Personal knowledge 17 means a present recollection of an impression derived from the exercise of the witness’s own 18 senses.”
- “Private rights of action for civil penalties under the Labor Code generally 2 arise under the California Private Attorney General Act, not under the Labor Code directly.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 13,305×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleySeventh Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 1,341×
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 1,311×
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-19· cited 841×
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Third Circuit· 1993-09-10· cited 830×
- State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 781×
- Keenan v. AllanNinth Circuit· 1996-08-01· cited 731×
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2004-06-25· cited 634×
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2006-07-03· cited 602×
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-04-12· cited 595×
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-16· cited 525×
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationNinth Circuit· 1979-03-22· cited 514×
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-28· cited 486×
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
- Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Ninth Circuit· 1991-12-18· cited 403×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.