Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/5/2009

Katz v. Gerardi

Citations

  • 552 F.3d 558
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13
  • 2009 WL 18137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the exception did not apply because the “[u]nits” at issue were not “trade[d] on a national securities exchange, . . . senior to a traded security, or . . . issued by registered investment company”
  • noting that the Katz panel “circulated [the opinion] before release to all judges in active service [and n]one of the judges favored a hearing en banc”
  • “[T]he plaintiff as master of the complaint may present (or abjure) any claim he likes.”
  • “Section 22(a) and the 2005 Act are incompatible; one or the other must yield.”
  • “Usually the older law yields to the newer.”
  • discussing Luther and holding the opposite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.