Skip to main content
· 3/6/2009

Public Employees' Retirement System v. Stanley

Citations

  • 605 F. Supp. 2d 1073
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19246
  • 2009 WL 764653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling 8 on motion to transfer first because case presented “difficult questions of statutory interpretation on 9 both of Defendants’ bases for removal”
  • finding the Court “need not address the propriety of removal before ruling on the motion to transfer”
  • “A decision to transfer for inconvenient forum is not a decision on the merits and 26 therefore does not require a finding of jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mariana R. Pfaelzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.