· 7/2/2009
Passarella v. Ginn Company
Citations
- 637 F. Supp. 2d 352
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62716
- 2009 WL 1953030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- antiremoval provision sharing its language with § 22(a) did not prohibit removal under § 1453
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.