· 2/27/1990
Cemar, Inc., T/a Rising Sun Motors v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. Appeal of Cemar Inc
Citations
- 897 F.2d 120
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1391
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2576
- 1990 WL 16530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that court lacked appellate jurisdiction because of unsupported Rule 54(b) order
- dismissing appeal, vacating order, and remanding when the district court failed to explain its reason for Rule 54(b) certification
- noting that \[b]ecause the reason for the Rule 54(b) certification [was] not apparent from the record\, we required \a statement of reasons by the district court in order to determine the juridical concerns [were] met by its determination that no just reason remains for delay\
- remanding for “a statement of reasons by the district court in order to determine that juridical concerns have been met by its determination that no just reason remains for delay”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stapleton, Mansmann, Ackerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.