Hawaii Supreme Court· 5/2/2013

Kaleikini v. Yoshioka.

Citations

129 Haw. 454
304 P.3d 252
2013 WL 1844892
2013 Haw. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that plaintiff failing to prevail on several counts did not change the outcome that they prevailed on the disputed main issue
rejecting enhancement when party-seeking fees failed to “establish that the lodestar is unreasonable, or that enhancement is necessary to achieve a reasonable fee”
“The first issue this court must resolve regarding Kaleikini’s request for attorney’s fees and costs is whether Kaleikini is the prevailing party on appeal.”
\a review of Kaleikini's request does not indicate that any of the requested fees are . . . clerical\
“[C]laims based on the constitution are not ‘founded upon any statute of the State.’” (internal alteration omitted) (quoting Kaho‘ohanohano, 162 P.3d at 732)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Browning, Acoba, Oto, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kaleikini v. Yoshioka.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.