Kaleikini v. Yoshioka.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failing to prevail on several counts did not change the outcome that they prevailed on the disputed main issue
• rejecting enhancement when party-seeking fees failed to “establish that the lodestar is unreasonable, or that enhancement is necessary to achieve a reasonable fee”
• “The first issue this court must resolve regarding Kaleikini’s request for attorney’s fees and costs is whether Kaleikini is the prevailing party on appeal.”
• \a review of Kaleikini's request does not indicate that any of the requested fees are . . . clerical\
• “[C]laims based on the constitution are not ‘founded upon any statute of the State.’” (internal alteration omitted) (quoting Kaho‘ohanohano, 162 P.3d at 732)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).