Kaleikini v. Yoshioka. Motion for Reconsideration, filed 09/04/2012.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \whether or not an agency has followed proper procedures . . . in making its determination is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo\ and, thus, \the agency is not entitled to deference\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing Honolulu rail project draft programmatic agreement for handling iwi kupuna
• “An agency’s interpretation of its own rules is generally entitled to deference.”
• “An agency’s interpretation of its own rules is generally entitled to deference.”
• discussing importance of procedural rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).