United States v. Ruth Muhammad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that lack of consent to disposition by a magistrate judge would strip the magistrate judge of ju risdiction over the case
• concluding that a RFRA defense raised “for the first time on appeal” would not warrant the exercise of remedial discretion under the final prong of plain error review
• concluding that a RFRA defense raised “for the first time on appeal” would not warrant the exercise of remedial discretion under the final prong of plain error review
• applying plain error review to First Amendment and RFRA arguments “raised for the first time on appeal”
• declining to consider in the first instance on appeal argument that RFRA protected federal prisoner from involuntary civil commitment for psychiatric treatment
• applying plain error standard of review where appellant only raised a RFRA argument “for the first time on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).