Fifth Circuit· 1/15/1999

United States v. Ruth Muhammad

Citations

165 F.3d 327
1999 WL 14223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that lack of consent to disposition by a magistrate judge would strip the magistrate judge of ju risdiction over the case
concluding that a RFRA defense raised “for the first time on appeal” would not warrant the exercise of remedial discretion under the final prong of plain error review
concluding that a RFRA defense raised “for the first time on appeal” would not warrant the exercise of remedial discretion under the final prong of plain error review
applying plain error review to First Amendment and RFRA arguments “raised for the first time on appeal”
declining to consider in the first instance on appeal argument that RFRA protected federal prisoner from involuntary civil commitment for psychiatric treatment
applying plain error standard of review where appellant only raised a RFRA argument “for the first time on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Barksdale, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.