Skip to main content
· 8/22/2012

United States v. $225,894 in U.S. Currency

Citations

  • 852 F. Supp. 2d 578
  • 2012 WL 3603105
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “but-for- plus” test is more stringent and that at least one commentator has concluded that it best characterizes Fifth Circuit law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.