Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/27/1988

Juarez v. State

Citations

758 S.W.2d 772
1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172
1988 WL 98938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“It was for the trial court, as the sole finder of fact at the suppression hearing, to determine whose version of the facts was true[.]”
“Voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances, and we accept the trial court’s finding unless it is clearly erroneous”
“Voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances, and we accept the trial court’s finding unless it is clearly erroneous”
“Voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances, and we accept the trial court’s finding unless it is clearly erroneous”
“Voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances, and we accept the trial court’s finding unless it is clearly erroneous”
State's Motion for Rehearing pending on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Juarez v. State

34 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.