First Circuit· 8/19/2004

Joyal v. Hasbro, Inc.

Citations

380 F.3d 14
2004 WL 1837725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that no reasonable jury could find that an employee's discharge was \arbitrary\ or unjustified where he sought to violate company policy
stating that G & M is governing precedent and has yet to be disapproved
“ ‘[I]f the reason given by the employer is the real reason for its action,’ it does not matter if ‘the employer’s action was arbitrary or unwise.’ ”
where an employee was terminated for, among other things, attempted misuse of company property, the fact that the attempted misuse was perhaps a less serious reason than the others cited and may not have led to the termination standing alone did not suggest that the reason was false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Joyal v. Hasbro, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.