Second Circuit· 10/5/1998
Jota v. Texaco Inc.
Citations
- 157 F.3d 153
- 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1282
- 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20181
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24615
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that deference to foreign state’s position on matters that took place within its territory is “inherent in the concept of comity”
- holding that deference to foreign state’s position on matters that took place within its territory is “inherent in the concept of comity”
- holding that the Ecuadorian ambassador “enjoyed apparent authority, and [defendant] and the District Court were entitled to rely on his representations unless they were actually aware that he lacked such authority”
- vacating dismissal, on forum non conveniens, comity, and failure to join indispensable party grounds, of action by Ecuadorians against American oil company for injuries that allegedly resulted from action in Ecuador
- advising Ecuador that it must waive sovereign immunity to intervene, which Ecuador declined to do
- “On remand, ... the District Court should independently reweigh the factors relevant to a forum non conveniens dismissal, rather than simply rely on Sequihua”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2010-09-17· cited 417×
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 319×
- Chevron Corp. v. NaranjoSecond Circuit· 2012-01-26· cited 135×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerSecond Circuit· 2016-08-08· cited 118×
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 114×
- Khulumani v. Barclay National Bank Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-10-12· cited 101×
- Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1999-06-30· cited 98×
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.S.D. New York· 2000-02-25· cited 88×
- Finanz Ag Zurich v. Banco Economico S.A.Second Circuit· 1999-10-07· cited 80×
- Republic of Ecuador v. Robert E. HincheeEleventh Circuit· 2013-12-18· cited 80×
- GDG Acquisitions, LLC v. Government of BelizeEleventh Circuit· 2014-04-22· cited 66×
- Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-08-16· cited 52×
- Laker Airways, Inc. v. British Airways, PLCEleventh Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 49×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerS.D. New York· 2014-03-04· cited 49×
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.S.D. New York· 1999-08-31· cited 48×
- Chevron Corporation v. Aaron PageFourth Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 48×
- Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.C.D. California· 2002-07-09· cited 45×
- Bano v. Union Carbide Corp.Second Circuit· 2001-11-15· cited 43×
- Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanS.D. New York· 2003-08-08· cited 31×
- In Re Chevron Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-11-10· cited 30×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 1,967×
- Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwaySecond Circuit· 1998-02-25· cited 260×
- Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. ChaterSupreme Court· 1996-01-08· cited 158×
- in All Cases which have been Consolidated into this Proceeding by Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation v. Union Carbide Corp.Second Circuit· 1987-01-14· cited 122×
- Dominic Murray v. British Broadcasting Corporation and Bbc Lionheart Television InternationalSecond Circuit· 1996-04-10· cited 112×
- Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of PeruSecond Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 82×
- Envirotech Corporation and Chemico Air Pollution Control Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Envirotech Corporation, on Counterclaim-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1984-02-17· cited 65×
- Jota v. Texaco Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-10-05· cited 58×
- Department of the Interior v. South DakotaSupreme Court· 1996-10-15· cited 37×
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service CompanySecond Circuit· 1981-05-29· cited 27×
- Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1994-01-27· cited 25×
- Aquinda v. Texaco, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-11-12· cited 22×
- Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-08-12· cited 12×
- Schmidt v. EspySupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.