Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. v. Banco Popular Del Peru and the Republic of Peru

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s exercise of jurisdiction because declining to do so would have been contrary to United States policy, but not alluding to the existence of a “true conflict”
• “Thus, the Executive Branch’s decision to bring this case could be viewed as evidence of its judgment that the delicate balance of foreign affairs would not be disturbed by this lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).