Skip to main content

Joseph v. People

Citations

  • 60 V.I. 338
  • 2013 WL 6795161
  • 2013 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Unquestionably, Superior Court Rule 135 applies to the exclusion of Federal Rule 33.”
  • “[W]e decline to decide this issue as part of this appeal because the 10-day limitations period is unquestionably a non-jurisdictional claims processing rule whose application — even if applicable — has been waived through the People’s failure to assert it in a timely manner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.