Skip to main content
· 10/29/2002

Joseph Anthony Padilla v. Cal A. Terhune

Citations

  • 309 F.3d 614
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12401
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10719
  • 59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 865
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 22498
  • 2002 WL 31415469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this court “may affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record, even if it differs from the reasoning of the district court”
  • this court “may affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record, even if it differs from the reasoning of the district court”
  • the district court may deny a § 2254 petition on the merits without first addressing 24 exhaustion, irrespective of whether the defense was waived by respondent
  • assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege makes a witness legally unavailable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Rawlinson, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.