United States v. Earnest Wilmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the witness’s Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 46A04-1407-CR-316 |June 10, 2015 Page 18 of 33 unanswered questions were not collateral and the witness’s testimony should have been stricken
• \Whether a limitation on cross-examination is so restrictive that it constitutes a violation of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right is reviewed de novo. \
• “Whether a limitation on cross-examination is so restrictive that it constitutes a violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amend- ment right is reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).