· 6/19/2012
Jose Cardona v. B. Bledsoe
Citations
- 681 F.3d 533
- 2012 WL 2335864
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the phrase “execution of the sentence” includes claims “that the BOP was not properly ‘putting into effect’ or ‘carrying out’ the directives of the sentencing judgment.”
- noting that the phrase “execution of the sentence” includes claims “that the BOP was not properly ‘putting into effect’ or ‘carrying out’ the directives of the sentencing judgment.”
- explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
- explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
- explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
- explaining that claims regarding execution of | sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing [ludament’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Fisher, Stearns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.