Skip to main content
· 6/19/2012

Jose Cardona v. B. Bledsoe

Citations

  • 681 F.3d 533
  • 2012 WL 2335864
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the phrase “execution of the sentence” includes claims “that the BOP was not properly ‘putting into effect’ or ‘carrying out’ the directives of the sentencing judgment.”
  • noting that the phrase “execution of the sentence” includes claims “that the BOP was not properly ‘putting into effect’ or ‘carrying out’ the directives of the sentencing judgment.”
  • explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
  • explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
  • explaining that claims regarding execution of sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing judgment”
  • explaining that claims regarding execution of | sentence are cognizable on habeas review when the “BOP’s conduct [is] somehow inconsistent with a command or recommendation in the sentencing [ludament’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Fisher, Stearns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.