Skip to main content
· 9/17/2008

Antonelli v. Warden, U.S.P. Atlanta

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 1348
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19624
  • 2008 WL 4225882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a petition challenging a decision of the federal Parole Commission is properly brought pursuant to § 2241
  • explaining that challenges to the execution of a sentence are cognizable under § 2241
  • finding that challenges to execution of a sentence are properly brought under § 2241
  • finding that challenges to execution of sentence are properly brought under § 2241
  • explaining challenges to the execution of a sentence, rather than to its validity, are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
  • dismissing a § 2241 petition where the petitioner had previously raised the same grounds in a § 2241 petition that was denied on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Black, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.