Francis v. Maloney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that recent Supreme Court dicta may call into question whether inmates can challenge the loss of good conduct time in a habeas petition
• stating that “an individual serving a supervised release term satisfies the ‘in custody requirement’” in the § 2255 context
• observing that § 2241 can be used “to challenge placement (or lack thereof) in a community confinement center”
• noting that recent Supreme Court dicta may call into question whether inmates can challenge the loss of good conduct time in a habeas petition
• noting that inmates may utilize a § 2241petition “to challenge placement (or lack thereof) in a community confinement center, or to contest one’s imprisonment in a specific facility”
• explaining that “an individual serving a supervised release term satisfies the ‘in custody’ requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).