Skip to main content
· 12/2/1998

James J. Valona v. United States

Citations

  • 138 F.3d 693
  • 1998 WL 105489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a motion seeking relief concerning the execution of a sentence, but not the validity of a conviction, falls under § 2241
  • stating that a motion seeking relief concerning the execution of a sentence, but not the validity of a conviction, falls under § 2241
  • stating that a motion seeking relief concerning the execution of a sentence, but not the validity of a conviction, falls under § 2241
  • stating that a motion seeking relief concerning the execution of a sentence, but not the validity of a conviction, falls under § 2241
  • stating that a motion seeking relief concerning the execution of a sentence, but not the validity of a conviction, falls under § 2241
  • unpublished per curiam; D.C.Cir. Local Rules 28(c)(1)(B), 36(c)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Easterbrook, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.